Fetish Parade: You Are Dead to Me
Filed under: Fetish Parade - August 21, 2008 @ 6:00 amWe’ve got a dead one here, boys and girls. Meet Jerry, a 50 yr old necrophiliac I met on Fetlife. Here is a link to a previous post I did on necro.
TBK: What do you call this “fetish”? Is there a name for it?
Jerry: This fetish can be called snuff fantasy or necrophilia. Or it can be referred to as erotic horror fantasy also. What is key is that it is meant to be fantasy or role played between consenting adults. There is no intent for real harm or violence.
TBK: Do you have a pic or two showing examples of the scenes you like? You mentioned doctoring your own pics.
Jerry: Yes.. I will post a couple of my manipulated photos here. This one depicts a hanging with a wire noose. I rolled her eyes, added the noose with shadow, caption and blue coloring to her face.
TBK: How did you get into this?
Jerry: I think the first time I got into this was acutally during childhood perhaps while watching cowboy and western “shoot’em ups.” I recall feeling mildly “aroused.” I also enjoyed playing a neighborhood game, called “best man falls.” Each “victim” would act out a dying scene after being “shot.” I especially enjoyed when the girls joined in.
TBK: What was the first horror movie you saw?
Jerry: My first horror movie - probably Dracula or Frankenstein.
TBK: What are your fav horror movies?
Jerry: Always enjoyed the Halloween series, Sleepaway camp type films, etc. Any films that involve hanging too.
TBK: Do you like slasher flicks/monsters/serial killers?
Jerry: I like the slasher flicks mostly. They tend to be more graphic. Usually feature women/girls either semi nude or scantily clothed as victims.
TBK: Are you into snuff films?
Jerry: I’ve never seen a real snuff film. But I do enjoy “enactments” of snuff films.
TBK: Would you like to experience a dead body?
Jerry: Yes, I think it would be fascinating to be in the presence of a newly dead corpse (of an attractive looking victim) and be able to spend time “exploring” it. Not sure if I would want to have sex with it, but might possibly get off posing it and viewing it.
TBK: What do you mean by “exploring” it?
Jerry: Looking at it, touching it, kissing it, but standing it up and watching it fall, defiling or defacing it, poking it, dragging it…cumming on it.
TBK: Are you into blood?
Jerry: Many of my photo manipulations feature small amounts of blood. I’m not into heavy blood and gore though. But sometimes I don’t mind it. For example, beheading is a great turn on to me.
Um, why?
Jerry: I often wonder how long the head remains concious after being severed. Does the victim see? For how long? From an erotic standpoint, it seems arousing that a beheaded victim could be used a variety of ways for sex: the corpse neck cavity, the head neck cavity, the mouth of the head for example. Also, it looks erotic to me if the head is placed close to or in the area of the penis or vagina of the victim. Some of the women that I’ve chatted with about beheading like the idea of having their own tongue of their severed head placed against their pussies…Would a fantasy involving my beheading and placement of my head on or near my cock arouse me…prob’ly!
TBK: What’s your fav method of beheading?
Jerry: Sword - clean swipe. Samurai is best.
TBK: What props turn you on?
Jerry: My favorite props are arrows, knives/swords, guns, and nooses.
TBK: Why do you like hanging so much?
Jerry: I think it looks very erotic especially if the victim is nude. It also objectifies the victim in the sense that after they have expired and are still dangling, they look kind of like an ornament on display.
TBK: Do you like the aspect of a woman being chased? or tortured or? the fear? the helplessness?
Jerry: I like the more consensual aspect of it. Not so much into the chasing, torturing. Helplessness yes. I am turned on by a woman that would want me to snuff her. Maybe even beg me to after having her orgasm or during her orgasm.
TBK: Have you roleplayed at all with this?
Jerry: Only online during chat role plays. My fantasy dream is to meet someone in person and role play a scene. Role plays have included hangings, shootings, beheadings, gutting, etc.
TBK: Have you met others who share this fetish? Is it mostly men?
Jerry: I have not met anyone in person who shares this fetish. Only online. Yes there are many men who do, but I prefer to interact with the women who are into it. I do make one exception and I have chatted with and correspond with a few attractive tgirls (transexuals) who enjoy this fantasy also. In fact I got one of them to agree to be an “actress” in a staged video clip for a outfit that does this kind of filming.
TBK: Are there any good websites/resources online that cater to this?
Jerry: Yes. My favorite is nicheclips.com. In there you see many video producers featured that specialize in this sort of fantasy. There are many interesting clips that can be purchased as “pay per view.”
TBK: Are you afraid of dying, or do you embrace it?
Jerry: I guess I’m not ready to die for a long while. I don’t mind role playing it, but I don’t want it to happen anytime too soon and would prefer it to be from natural causes/old age.
August 21st, 2008 at 6:26 am
Well, this isn’t nearly as creepy as I had expected it to be.
August 21st, 2008 at 7:18 am
How interesting, Is this a dominance thing for him or is he just looking for the unrejecting partner? Thinking of the corpses, does he believe they love him, or is it purely a sexual toy?
On a side note, the Egyptians believed that if a woman died a virgin or unwed that her soul would never be able to find peace, so they would have sex with the body to send the soul to its resting place.
August 21st, 2008 at 9:39 am
I just wanted to leave a little snipit here for all of you who are getting ready to say things like: “Oh this isn’t that bad”, “yeah I might be into this” or “I can see where this guy is coming from”. Here it is: “From an erotic standpoint, it seems arousing that a beheaded victim could be used a variety of ways for sex: the corpse neck cavity, the head neck cavity,….” (in case you missed it and didn’t get the picture in your head the first time) Have a fruitful day everyone. The Professor
August 21st, 2008 at 10:30 am
I have to say, what really creeps me out is how casual this guy seems about it, as if it is a normal thing. Like the whole beheading thing…that’s a bit out there.
Look, I don’t have a problem with people who have weird fetishes, but when it has the potential to turn into something dangerous then I get concerned. Sure, he’s only into role playing online now, but what happens when that’s not enough? What happens when the role playing doesn’t turn you on anymore and you get urges to take it to the next level? It’s that type of thing that makes me nervous about these kinds of fetishes. It’s kind of like the whole rape fantasy thing, what happens when the fantasy isn’t enough anymore?
August 21st, 2008 at 10:33 am
Well… Someone is a wet rag!
August 21st, 2008 at 10:39 am
i’ve ALWAYS wanted to fuck a freshly dead corpse, especially a hot female. for me it’s just an extension of passed out fucking. like i’ve always gotten off on the idea, in movies, when a lover dies. the person gets all weird and freaks out. and i am sitting there like ” HELLO?” are you gonna fuck that ass real quick or WHAT????!!!! it has something to do with the sex toy idea of using a womans body to masturbate. similar to having a woman just lay there and pretend to be dead or asleep, but they just really are dead. the only real problem is 1. how did she die??? 2. how did her vagina get full of your cum if she was dead??? these are all questions the police would ask.
i could see a night of valium gone wrong. hours of fucking until one realized their partner was dead. that’s sorta innocent. and then get that one last fuck on !!!
August 21st, 2008 at 10:42 am
Matt, yeah the beheading thing is FUCKED UP!
I dunno, I have the rape fantasy thing, but to me it’s completely separate from a real rape. If I ask a man I’m with to role play a rape scene and he’s down with it and can give me what I want, I don’t think once he gets a taste of it that he’ll go rape a random woman next.
At the same time, I find myself continually taking it up a notch in my head and the bedroom (or dungeon, ha!) But as long as it’s consensual and no one gets hurt, I’m OK with it. VERY OK with it…BRING IT ON!
August 21st, 2008 at 10:54 am
I’ll come right out and say that personally, I find nothing erotic about dead bodies, and the idea of them being arousing is kind of gross to me. Having spent my share of time around dead bodies in my previous job (paramedic), there just ain’t anything sexy there. Sorry Jerry, but don’t feel bad, your kink isn’t the only one that’s not for me - I’d imagine some of the things I’m into would probably be kind of gross to you. No harm, no foul.
With that said, I’ve got to touch on Matt’s comment - and apologize to TBK in advance if this causes a shit storm. Not my intention, I just can’t ignore this one.
Matt said: “Look, I don’t have a problem with people who have weird fetishes, but when it has the potential to turn into something dangerous then I get concerned. Sure, he’s only into role playing online now, but what happens when that’s not enough? What happens when the role playing doesn’t turn you on anymore and you get urges to take it to the next level? It’s that type of thing that makes me nervous about these kinds of fetishes.”
Here’s what I just heard when I read your comments, Matt -
“The introduction of legalized gay marriages will lead inexorably to polygamy and other alternatives to one-man, one-woman unions. ” from http://www.nogaymarriage.com/tenarguments.asp
“Wang said legalizing same-sex marriage would eventually lead to polygamy, multipartner marriage and incest.” from http://www.sfisonline.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/04/26/BAG4R6B18L1.DTL
I planned to keep posting examples of people who question if legalization of gay marriage will lead to acceptance of things like beastiality, incest, polygamy a la Warren Jeffs, etc. but just reading these sites to find the quotes was making me ill, so I’ll stop here.
It’s the entire idea that someone is incapable of engaging in one degree of “kink” or “lifestyle” without it leading to much worse things that bugs the shit out of me. I’m sorry Matt, but those were some pretty closed-minded comments you made there, and jumping on the “what if’s” bandwagon just because you don’t embrace, or even understand someone else’s kink is kind of disappointing.
August 21st, 2008 at 11:25 am
You couldn’t ask just ONE question about his childhood? For instance: Was his mother an alcoholic? Was his mother VERY critical (everything he did was wrong)? Were either of his parents abusive, to him or each other?
August 21st, 2008 at 11:48 am
I find this to be surprisingly fascinating. I’m not into this particular fetish, but I can see how one might. As one commenter said, it’s a dominance thing. I was curious as to whether or not those “human dolls” do anything for this sort of kink.
I was watching “real sex”, that HBO show, and they had a full segment on these really expensive life-like dolls designed to have sex with. They obviously are lifeless though. Theoretically you could do whatever you wanted to them and it would be similar to a corpse, sans the “killing” aspect. Just a thought.
August 21st, 2008 at 11:57 am
Yup, the dolls thing I can understand, but dead people, EWWW.
Oh well, I guess it is all right, as long as no one really gets hurt. Right?
August 21st, 2008 at 11:59 am
And yeah, is Lena ever going to tell us about her experience dating a necrophiliac?
August 21st, 2008 at 12:50 pm
Sapph, I didn’t get that impression from Matt’s comments, but I can see your point. I’m not sure it is akin to the Rick Santorum-style slippery slope arguments, however. I think that Matt is perhaps thinking of it in the “warning flag” manner. Ie: Kids who torture animals have a high tendency to commit violent crimes against people later in life. I don’t think that anyone worth listening to would try and propose that people who have homosexual experiences are more apt to have sex with animals or relatives. I don’t think that there is a causatory link there, that’s all. To that point, most serial killers/rapists are much younger than 50 when they start. So if he had some morphing of his fetish into something more sinister/dangerous, I think it would have manifested by this point in his life. (Unless it has and he’s just really good at hiding the corpses.) Side notes: WTF do poly and multi-partner marriage have to do with incest? That’s like the Sesame Street “one of these things is not like the other” game. “Pistaschio, mint chocolate, and fecal matter.” Also, I think that I was more bothered by Lion’s comments than I was by Jerry’s. If someone whom I “cared about” died and my first thought was “time to get my fuck on” the amount of emotional attachment is obviously minimal. Not that there aren’t all kinds, but hard-ons are not part of the grieving process. Or maybe I’m just a traditionalist. TBK, very interesting interview, thank you.
August 21st, 2008 at 1:05 pm
Oh, and I’m not sure how familiar Jerry is with anatomy, but there is no neck cavity with a decapitated head or body. The spinal column is fairly solid. I suppose that with a small enough cock, one may be able to fuck the trachea or esophagus, although I doubt it. http://www.revolutionhealth.com/articles/neck-anatomy-partial/zm5037
I suppose it could wind up with someone coming OUT of someone’s mouth for a change, or an interesting take on the “angry dragon.”
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=angry+dragon
Additionally, a “wire noose” of that thin a gauge in the picture would sever the flesh ala piano-wire garrote in the mob movies. So there is definitely a solid “fantasy” aura to all of this. Were he calculating the physics of what worked and didn’t, or such things, I would be more inclined to worry like Matt.
August 21st, 2008 at 1:07 pm
Dor, I was thinking the same thing!
Rev. Lion, how is it that you make the craziest shit sound not only perfectly normal but fun???!!! You always twist my mind!
I think I’m agreeing a bit with Matt here. To each his own, I don’t want to have to explain any of my fetishes cause they seem normal to me. It’s just a little scary though when a fetish has a kind of dangerous (in a bad way) potential. One little slip-up or a little too far and the game is really OVER. I’m sure that’s part of the turn-on but once a person starts experimenting with fetishes the need for MORE could increase to what could be a truly frightening level in these circumstances.
August 21st, 2008 at 1:27 pm
Wolf made a point I was about to say, if the man is into his 50s the threat of his sexuality turning brutal is minimal. Still, I did find this to be incredibly interesting. I think those of us that do not find this practice to be sexual are amazed that the other individual isn’t more ashamed, but if it comes naturally to them why would they act so? I went to a strict church where talking about sex from even parent to child was a source of shame and embarrassment that they could ever give into their own lusts even with their spouse, you want to talk about fucked up, lets talk about that.
August 21st, 2008 at 1:31 pm
Kevin - it wasn’t nearly as bad as you think. I just… wasn’t too into it.
August 21st, 2008 at 4:20 pm
Sapph,
I have to say, I am quite impressed that you managed to spin my comments on fantasy/reality into an anti-gay agenda. You’re not a politician are you? Hmmm, I think you are stretching way too much.
The comparison of a person fantasizing about something and then moving on to the realization of that fantasy is completely different than gays moving to bestiality or whatever ridiculous thing you perceived my comment as. Unless gays fantasized about bestiality than there is no correlation. The whole thing is ridiculous and has nothing to do with my point.
So, lets get back to my point. There are truths in our society that we know. We know rapists exist. We know pedophiles exist. We also know, from a majority of psychologists and various studies, that rapists and pedophiles, among other things, stem from an initial fantasy of those particular acts. Is it not fair to say that the fantasy of something such as necrophilia has at least a minimal possibility of turning into a reality?
Lets take a look at the interview for a moment. Jerry starts out by saying that his initial interest in necrophilia which began as a simple childhood game called “shoot ‘em up” and he was intrigued by the concept of the girls pretending to die. Later he admits to being turned on by naked dead girls in slasher flicks. And now he talks about about his fantasy of defiling a woman’s decapitated head and being turned on by women who tell him he they want to be “snuffed!” It’s pretty clear to me that there is a clear line of progressive fantasy which over time gets more and more perverse.
I’m not saying that our friend Jerry will take it to the next level, but it does concern me.
August 21st, 2008 at 5:24 pm
I’m sorry Matt, but I do still see a strong similarity between your leap to escalation and their leap to escalation (in terms of what we pervs
will want if gays are allowed to marry).
I get that you didn’t mean it that way, but sorry, that’s how you came across to me.
I don’t much care for Jerry’s kink, and can think of a number of fundamental objections to it - lack of consent being primary since, no, I don’t think someone can consent to being killed for sex (not to be confused with right-to-die when facing a fatal disease - whole different mindset). I’d say someone who truly WANTS to die for sex potentially has more than a few screws loose and is not in a mentally competent position to be giving consent.
With that said, I just don’t assume there’s a path to escalation simply because someone’s fantasies differ from mine or because I find them weird or even objectionable.
I’m heavy into BDSM, - but it doesn’t mean I’m going to escalate into, say, an abusive relationship (in either direction), or into something like taking my cutting fetish to the extreme - stabbing, amputation, etc. My husband likes CBT - no one is worried he’s going to turn that into a castration fantasy tomorrow.
It’s the quick leap to the “what if’s” of escalation I object to, Matt - and I’m sorry, but that IS what you did, at least as I see it. Doesn’t seem to be what you intended, but it’s how I interpreted your initial post. My apologies if I read you wrong.
August 21st, 2008 at 6:18 pm
Not to be all “everyone jump on Matt” here but:
“We know pedophiles exist. We also know, from a majority of psychologists and various studies, that rapists and pedophiles, among other things, stem from an initial fantasy of those particular acts.”
Define majority.
Show me a reputable organization.
Show me the actual study.
Let me work the stats.
What it feels like you’re doing is taking serial killer theories - you know, start off killing animals, slowly progress to humans - and applying it to sexual fantasies.
August 21st, 2008 at 8:17 pm
Matt, I’m still with you.
August 21st, 2008 at 8:30 pm
Iena, I was the one who made the serial killer statements, as that is borderline what we’re discussing with this particular fetish. So the blame for “going there” is probably better directed a me, insofar as the serial killer aspect. The interest is only partially in necrophilia, but also in the actual act of killing. That’s why it is more than a necro fetish. Many of the famous serial killers have had fantasies stemming from, or involving the sexual nature of the victim or themselves. Sexuality is so deeply rooted in our being and subsequent culture, it is almost an absurd notion that it can be dismissed from the psyche with sociopathic or homocidal tendencies. I would suggest reading up on some guys such as Ed Gein, Jeffrey Dahmer, Denis Rader (the BTK killer), Eusebius Pieydagnelle… I don’t think that, when you’re aware of their stories, that Matt’s assertions are that farfetched. Once again, I don’t think Jerry is a threat, but I can see what Matt is saying, in the general, abstract sense. I totally disagree that it is the same as the homosexuality demonization arguments. I think that conversation thread is very apples and oranges, although I appreciate the sensitivity displayed by Sapph. Fuck… work wants me to do something besides this… bastards… more to come.
August 21st, 2008 at 8:33 pm
“My apologies if I read you wrong.”
Yea you read me wrong, I accept your apology:)
Still not sure how gay marriage got thrown into this conversation but I am certainly not against by the way. I’m also certainly not against pervs, or else a wouldn’t be reader here:) So, my apologies to everyone for questioning the guy who fantasizes about fucking decapitated heads.
August 21st, 2008 at 9:13 pm
Wolf - Psychologist. Psychopathy is part of what I specialize in.
August 21st, 2008 at 10:42 pm
As the only person in this discussion who has performed for a producer and has videos of himself as the murderer/ rapist/ necrophiliac posted on nicheclips I think I can speak with a bit of authority. IT”S ROLEPLAY!!!!! IT”S FANTASY!!!! I feel no more compulsion or desire to commit any of the acts that were performed on camera in real life then Robert Englund is going to fashion a glove with razors on the fingers and start hunting kids down.
August 22nd, 2008 at 12:41 am
Robert Englund actually DID fashion a glove with blades and hunt down kids. While they were sleeping no less. There are a series of documentaries about it. It was after he starred in “V” I believe. And with all due respect, and not to dismiss your opinion, (just your expertise), you are no more an authority in this arena than Jenna Jameson is an expert in the field of human sexuality. One person’s experience does not negate oodles of research and data. I would be interested to hear your rather unique perspective though. The only thing that I’m rather emphatic about is that Matt’s assertion is not akin to the religious wrong’s homophobic bullshit, as implied/stated by the wonderful Sapph. Other than that it’s all very debatable and gray, I believe. So share with the group, would you Paulie? And any chance you might provide links to your work so that we may check it out?
August 22nd, 2008 at 3:44 am
HERE IS FEEDBACK FROM JERRY:
- had a good childhood with very loving parents. Almost doting. I truly believe that our likes/dislikes, the things that turn us on are simply wired in from birth. There really was nothing that happened in a traumatic sense to me that gives rise to this fantasy. It just is. I’m sure that the way it is with others and their fetishes/fantasies. It’s probably difficult to point to a particular life experience and say, “yes! that is what caused all this.”
-will my fantasies ever escalate into something violent? NEVER. As I indicated in the interview, my preference is to role play or game play with a consenting partner. If my partner was not completely into this fantasy, it wouldn’t work and I wouldn’t push it. I am only into the pleasureable aspect of this. Not into real harm in any way. I would take extra care to be sure that anything done with a partner is safe.
- the doll thing and the unconscious sex thing was a very interesting analogy. I have noticed that more and more, “sleepy girl” porn sites seem to be gaining a foothold in mainstream. I think that’s very much inline with this fantasy or related in a way that it involves having sex with a non-rejecting partner and dominating.
August 22nd, 2008 at 7:56 am
Interesting, nature vs. nurture, maybe we are pretty much born who we are. I suppose different people react to childhood traumas, in different ways too. One person could have had Charles Manson’s childhood and turned out totally different.
August 22nd, 2008 at 9:14 am
Yeah Chiavata, I read Rev. Lion’s comment and giggled like a little girl and thought about how fun it would be to overdose on ganja oil and videotape Rev. Lion DICKING ME DOWN. Would be a good video to play in the background at a swanky dinner party…
August 24th, 2008 at 11:49 am
I don’t think that there is much chance that Jerry is going to start running around snuffing people just so he can live out his fantasies. His may not be a common fantasy, yet take a look over on sites like Google at all the various kinds of snuff going on there, in pictures, stories, and discussons. As for the kind of fantasy he has, I have engaged in some on-line role play and yet I really have no desire to have my head lopped off or to lop off another person’s head. All this talk about a fantasy leading to the actual thing is dependent on whether a person can tell the difference about fantasy and reality. I don’t think a person will cross the line unless they are already having problems in that line. Of course if the kid next door is burning cats and gutting dogs for fun, then keep the windows closed and the doors locked and call the police. But as for Jerry and his fantasy, I think he’s safe to be around. Just hide the rope and knives.
August 24th, 2008 at 12:37 pm
Interestingly I could imagine fucking a corpse before I could imagine kissing one.
TBK what do you think of this kind of roll playing interest you at all or just for the interview?
August 24th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
I’m not interested in guts and mutilation, but I do like some aspects of it. I like the idea of being used. Anais Nin wrote a really hot necro fantasy… I’m going to feature it on the blog sometime and let readers weigh in.
August 24th, 2008 at 3:49 pm
Being used I’m cool with, especially if it’s the right person using me. I’ve always drawn my hard line at blood & Guts and feces.
August 25th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
TBK, I want to be at the dinner party! Can I be the centerpiece?
August 25th, 2008 at 3:09 pm
chi, but of course!
xoxo
August 26th, 2008 at 9:27 pm
There’s a terrifying bit of kink-fetish-culture on the ‘net in this regard. Nothing against the fetish, to each their own, and some of it can even get a bit erotic to me, but this stuff scares me. Look up “DolcettGirls” on Google if you want to see how far these fantasies go. (and yet they remain fantasy, to my knowledge, none of this stuff ends up happening.)
August 27th, 2008 at 4:28 am
Yes, that is the key - that all of this remains fantasy. It could certainly be role played, but limits have to be established (like any other bdsm activity), everyone is consenting and that it is only for erotic fun.
August 27th, 2008 at 11:45 am
FIRSTLY, just because it would be fun to fuck someone who just died does NOT mean that i was talking about someone i love. I just don’t mind the idea of busting one LAST nut up in that ass, a sort of spiritual way to sanctify the dead person.
Some of you sopund like teenagers debating whether or not marijuana is a gateway drug. It’s like saying that masturbation is a gateway activity. Yes, this is true, BUT it is not the masturbation that CAUSES my deep ass fetishes, it is the “thing” that initially caused the masturbation that IS the ultimate cause. just like a person who is destined to smoke crack is bound to smoke weed alng the way, BUT it is not the weed that CAUSED the person to smoke crack-cocaine.
Just because i day dream about ripping apart a woman with the sheer force of my cock does not mean i would ever hurt a woman. because i wouldn’t.
and what i really think is funny is how people on here act “concerned” for someone else. HA HAAAA, yeah right, if you wanna be concerned about some fucked up shit, how about quit paying income taxes, because you are a part of a huge monster that ACTUALLY KILLS MILLIONS OF PEOPLE. this monster is known as AMERICA………
waaaaaah, waaaaaaaah babies. who gives a fuck….humans love death. humans love experience. we all want a taste of something, and we will all taste the flames of hell before we are done……………………
August 27th, 2008 at 11:54 am
PS- i fucking LOVE the scene in HOUSE OF 1000 CORPSES when the cops bust open the shed and all those hot ass sexy fucking cheerleaders are hanging up dead. tha shit gets me SOOOO hard. especially cuz i know that they are actually alive, and sexy as FUCK ! ! ! ! !
fucking dead people would get old cuz they DON’T FIGHT BACK !!!
also, i have no interest in killing people, unless of course they died from the sheer force of my cock and the explosion that follows. i remember thsi awesome anime’ that i saw when i was maybe 15. nothing has ever turned me on more. This god was reborn and he finds this sexy little 60 pound lookin japanese girl, and he fucks her, BUt his cock and his energy were so intense that she exploded with light, a metaphor of the extreme orgasm…….she didn’t survive.
so ever since then i’ve had the fantasy of being so powerful that my cock filled women, or the cum load was so large it would spray out of her every orifice.
August 27th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
Yeah like I said, I’m glad Rev. Lion pulled out of me when he came, otherwise I’d be The Blasted Kind…
August 27th, 2008 at 12:00 pm
WOLF- “hard ons are not a part of the grieving process”
i don’t know what the fuck planet you live on buddy, but here on earth, sex is one of the most importrant parts of the grieving/healing process. it’s known as sexual healing.
for instance, if TBK died, i know she’d be down with me fucking her one last time(or 10).
the point is also, i would have already been fucking, and THEN the person might die. i’m not just gonna see a dead person on the street and be like, ” ooh, that would be fun to fuck”
what do ya’ll think i am, a sick fuck or something ???
i simply would FINISH the session that got started whether the person is dead alive conscious or unconscious. GET ER DONE!
August 27th, 2008 at 12:10 pm
And on that note, a hard man is good to find…