Cut vs. Uncut
Filed under: Eros - May 11, 2007 @ 4:46 pm
All right, boys and girls, which do you like better - cut or uncut cock?
I’m more used to cut (mainly due to being American, but my fondness for Jews also plays a part), so I was glad to hear of the study announced last month that suggested circumsized penises were less susceptible to STDs. I admit, I favor the look and smell of cut (unwashed uncut can have a musky odor.)
But I recently read an essay by Diane Petryk-Bloom on the matter, and it gave me pause. I mean, there’s something to be said about natural, and ponder this: the head is the most sensitive part, so how many nerve endings are getting damaged when skin gets sliced? The most intriguing idea Petryk-Bloom suggested was this: uncut men pleasure women better. They fit better, they’re more in sync with what a woman wants when it comes to intercourse.
Petryk-Bloom pointed out that lots of cut men resort to a “jackhammer style” of sex, driving hard and fast into the woman in order to get the feeling he needs to achieve orgasm. This is OK at times, but I think all women will roll their eyes along with me at the thought of this being a regular thing.
From a book called Sex As Nature Intended It, by Kristen and Jeff O’Hara:
The design of the natural penis indicates that nature intended for pleasure and orgasm to be induced by actions taking place mostly in the upper area of the penis. However, for the circumsized penis, the upper penis mechanisms and responses have been drastically altered and do not function the way nature intended.
Consequently, the circumsized male is left to improvise alternative and supplementary means to attain orgasm. It is use of these odd varieties or orgasm-building (pleasure seeking) techniques that causes him to thrust much differently from the intact man, and which his female partner finds frustrating and disrupting to her pleasuring needs.
Is it true - do uncut men fuck more stylishly? I’ve been with uncut men, but I can’t really say I noticed a difference, but now I want to explore this. Wouldn’t it be fun to set up a night to test this idea out? Invite two friends over - one circumsized, and one not - and have sex with both of them and see who you like better…see who makes the cut, so to speak.
May 12th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
Oh finally! I love that topic. Thanks for bringing it up.
First, I should say I do believe cutting the foreskin is a form of genital mutilation. Not only does it eliminate nerve endings, but it is also accounts for a severe painful trauma at a very early age. Newborns in the United States don’t get any pain medication when this “surgery” is performed. Usually, after circumcision they sleep nonstop for 12-16 hours to recover from the trauma. Needless to say, I didn’t let my son go under the blade. And the pediatrician told me that, according to the latest research, there is no difference between cut and uncut in terms of infections and STDs.
In terms of pleasuring the woman, my preference is undoubtedly for uncut guys. I have been with an equal number of uncut and cut guys. My preferred sex research method is ethnography (long-term observations, small sample), so my findings are probably not generalizable to the whole population:) Here is what I know so far:
1. Uncut guys create stronger pulsations inside the vagina and tickle my cervix in a very cool way. It’s easier to tell when they are going to come and adjust to their rhythm to drive them crazy at the end. And, when they do come, the sensation is awesome.
2. Uncut guys are significantly more interested in sex. Now, this may be a cultural difference, but before coming to the U.S., I thought that all guys can do it three to five times a night. Which is nice, because each ejaculation sensitizes the cervix and the uterus, which means each orgasm (for me) is stronger the second, the third or the fourth time.
3. Uncut guys are less interested in foreplay and more interested in action. Since I mostly hate foreplay anyway (my breasts are not very sensitive), I find that to be a plus.
4. Both uncut and cut guys require some training until they learn to move fluidly, as if they are moving through water. Some never learn. I don’t think this part has to do with being circumcized or not.
5. Cut guys are easier to do oral sex on, for obvious reasons. The main difference here is that in oral and hand jobs cut guys require some treatment on the head with the entire (preferably wet) palm of the hand; uncut guys get enough pleasure simply when you move the foreskin back and forth, since there is usually enough of it.
Now that I got it summarized, I really feel like packing and moving back to Europe
May 12th, 2007 at 5:14 pm
I also believe circumcision to be a form of mutilation. god put it there for a reason- who are we to take it away? OH- did god tell us that he made a mistake that only Jews need to rectify? Sounds like a crock to me.
May 12th, 2007 at 8:19 pm
Wow, this is really funny. So kinfe_a_phobe just called me, and I started complaining to her about my last cut guy. The conversation got to the topic of condoms.
“Did you use a condom?” she asked.
I sighed. “No, I really don’t like condoms. I like it when guys come inside me.”
“Are you Lolita by any chance?” she asked.
“Oh my gosh,” I laughed hysterically. “Of course I am.”
May 12th, 2007 at 10:44 pm
From an uncut perspective, i am into foreplay, i am a rock climber so i am into movement and love the sensations of minimalist but accurate stimulation (sounds a bit clinical). Don’t get me wrong, the most beautiful thing i have ever seen is sweat dripping through a partners cleavage, but i am sure there is a lot of unnecessary pounding going on as well.
As for condoms, it is pretty much a for her benefit only sort of event if one is required. Although if she is into a bit more of a active event this can mean a long time of what ever she is looking for.
While i would never claim that i was a god in the sack i have had favorable reviews, a lot of return visits and many of my partners girlfriends asking me to talk to their partners, so i must be doing something right. Although i have also found that there is only very few techniques that work across the board.
May 13th, 2007 at 4:35 am
don’t get me wrong. uncuts do foreplay as well, but how good they are depends on how they feel movement. my last uncut guy was the only one to make me come with oral sex, because he assumed nothing and really listened to my body’s responses. hmm… talented people like this should become dancers, for everyone’s pleasure, but he ended up being just a sociologist.
and by the way, some men don’t like it when the woman sweats. that was a surprise to me.
May 13th, 2007 at 6:08 am
I love guys with Original Cocks (as opposed to Surgically Modified Cocks - i.e. cut guys). I love the way complete cocks roll and slide. I hate the rapid hard thrust of a cut cock and I hate the dryness that a cut cock causes. But I LOVE the wetness a decent cock with a lovely silky foreskin creates. I dislike how long it takes for a lot of circumcised guys to come, and I don’t like the comparative limpness of cut cocks (guys with foreskins have harder erections, in my experience, and are more easily stimulated). I love how a complete cock jumps in your mouth when you press your tongue against the head. I love how you can feel the blood pulsing in a foreskin. I love the way guys with complete cocks nestle their erection into you, how the sexy smooth push doesn’t feel like there’s any friction at all. I also find the smell and taste of a foreskin completely arousing (obviously I mean ones which are washed daily - any unwashed cock can get a bit ripe). I love it when you breathe on a cock that’s hidden by a foreskin, maybe touch it with your face or lips softly, and can watch it come out of hiding. I love to see the head of a cock emerging from a growing erection.
OK, so I guess the moral of the story is that I love cocks but I especially and utterly love complete ones with all their bits intact!
And as an aside, I also don’t think hundreds of thousands of years of evolution intended us to cut things off human bodies. Stop attacking tiny babies’ genitals with sharp instruments for no reason!
Over and out
May 14th, 2007 at 10:39 am
I love this topic when it comes up. It was in my local paper a few weeks back as well. My reply was and is…who cares, mind your own business. It’s a personal choice and I couldn’t care less whether some girls like uncut or cut. My wife loves my dick and that’s that. I’m circumsised, she loves it, and I can tell you most definitely that I have not lost any sensation. If I was any more sensitive I’d be coming every time my pants shifted.
I have a 6 month old son and we had him circumsised. He smiles and laughs all the time. He doesn’t seem to hate me. And I’m guessing that the procedure is something that his mind didn’t store for retrieval at a later date as he sit’s reclinded in a horizontal position telling his story to a older bearded gentleman charging him $200 an hour to listen.
May 14th, 2007 at 3:51 pm
Yeah, I’d laugh at the topic too if it was about girls having part of their cunts cut off and I’d had it done to me. I’d hate the thought that I was missing out on what sexual sensations feel like when you haven’t been surgically interfered with. Infant circumcision isn’t a personal choice; it’s something done TO you. It’s ridiculous to say “I can tell you most definitely that I have no lost any sensation” because you’ve never known it any other way, rtist.
Your son might not remember the pain or trauma of his circumcision, but he may feel very strongly the frustration of having erection problems when he gets older - there’s lots of evidence to suggest circumcised guys suffer from impotency at a rate far higher than that of guys with normal penises. If I had my clitorial hood cut off at birth, after 50 years of pants rubbing on my exposed, unprotected clitoris, I’m sure it wouldn’t be functioning the same anymore either.
I’m not trying to make anybody feel bad about their penis - but it would be nice if people stopped inflicting such pointless crap on their kids.
May 15th, 2007 at 10:05 am
Re: nerve endings being cut off.
Yeah, what most guys really need is for their cock to be MORE sensitive.
I plan to circumsize any boys I have to protect them from AIDS and to make sure his future sex partners don’t suffer from chronic blue balls/blue clit.
May 16th, 2007 at 7:06 am
Oh Manj, thanks so much for your insightful intrusion into my personal life. Who would have thought you could glean so much knowledge about my inner feelings without ever meeting me or knowing me at all. You truly are something very special in our world. Thanks for being there Manj.
May 17th, 2007 at 2:39 pm
excuse me but i do believe you brought up your personal life by:
a. talking about your “cicumsised” penis.
b. bragging that your wife loves it.
c. bringing your poor innocent son into this.
and seriously, how the heck are you going to remember what sensations you’re missing if you never had them to begin with?!
that is the faultiest logic i’ve ever in my life heard.
June 2nd, 2007 at 11:18 am
Study the quality of the research that purports to say circumcision protects against AIDS. Then ponder how, in this most-cut country, we have an astronomical AIDS rate and then look to countries that don’t circumcize — like Japan, with their low AIDS rate — and go figure.
July 16th, 2007 at 4:42 pm
Burn in hell rtist, you sick piece of shit.